From what I’ve seen, Rails’ weakest features lie in the way it prepares the test database and test data, and Ruby’s Test::Unit isn’t much better than the awful but ubuiquitous JUnit that Java developers are accustomed to. I set out this week to impose my preferences on Rails in this area, and that took some effort. Here’s what I did.
Continue reading “Rails, Fixtures, the Test DB, and Test::Unit”
Rails and the notion of Stupid Databases Being a Good Idea
For the last few days I’ve been struggling to bend Rails to my will regarding the proper way to assure data consistency. Today I made some progress. This builds upon some research I did a few months ago, and hopefully this is a more or less complete solution to the problem of making Rails work the way I want it to regarding test databases.
Continue reading “Rails and the notion of Stupid Databases Being a Good Idea”
Looking forward to LinuxWorld Expo SF 2007
Last year I was doing mobile development and there was interesting Linux-as-smartphone-OS stuff going on. Now I’m doing Ruby on Rails development and there’s interesting server grid stuff going on. Here’s what I’m looking forward to finding out more about (all of these are things I’ve been watching or directly researching already):
Continue reading “Looking forward to LinuxWorld Expo SF 2007”
Full Text Search refuses to be a black box
Once upon a time, before Google pwn3d internet search, there were several competing definitions for full text search. Altavista more or less gave you results matching the exact strings you gave it, but in a crazy order that made it painful to use. Excite (my favorite back then) used a dictionary to achieve stemming and synonym matches: searching for ‘dogs’ would also match documents that contained ‘canines’ or ‘dog’. Then Google blew them all away, and established a dominant set of expectations for how text search behaves.
I forgot about this, which is why I’m frustrated by the almost ridiculous complexity of the major server-side text search engines available right now. But it makes sense, once you learn what the options are.
Continue reading “Full Text Search refuses to be a black box”
RCOV C0 line coverage more generous than EMMA’s C1 line coverage
Coverage tests in Ruby (with rcov) are less strict than in Java (with EMMA), so watch out – 100% coverage is easy to attain but not as meaningful.
Continue reading “RCOV C0 line coverage more generous than EMMA’s C1 line coverage”